facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Toyota Matrix vs 2006 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2013 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume19.8 ft30.56 m3

2006 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon STD Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon STD Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon STD Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XRS 6-Spd Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2012 vs. 2013

2003 vs. 2006

2009 vs. 2008

2010 vs. 2007

2011 vs. 2004