facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Mercedes-Benz C 250 vs 2015 Mercedes-Benz C 250

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2013 Mercedes-Benz C 250

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 250 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 250 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 63 AMG Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3

2015 Mercedes-Benz C 250

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 250 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 63 AMG Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 4MATIC Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 300 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
AMG C 63 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
AMG C 63 S Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 400 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 250 Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 250 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2012

2014 vs. 2015