facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Toyota Matrix vs 2004 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2012 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Man L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto L FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Man S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S FWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3
5dr Wagon Auto S AWD Cargo Volume49.4 ft31.4 m3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Wagon Std Manual Cargo Volume53.2 ft31.51 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon Std Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XR Auto AWD Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3
5dr Wagon XRS 6-Spd Manual Cargo Volume21.8 ft30.62 m3

Go to the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2009

2006 vs. 2007

2004 vs. 2013

2011 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2003