facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Buick Regal vs 2011 Buick Regal

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2012 Buick Regal

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Base Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
Premium 1 Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
Premium 2 Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
Turbo Premium 1 Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
Turbo Premium 2 Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
Turbo Premium 3 Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
GS Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3

2011 Buick Regal

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
CXL RL1 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL1 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL2 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL2 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL3 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL3 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL4 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL4 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL5 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL5 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL6 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL RL6 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO1 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO1 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO2 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO2 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO3 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO3 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO4 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO4 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO5 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO5 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO6 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO6 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO7 (Oshawa) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3
CXL Turbo TO7 (Russelsheim) Trunk Volume14.2 ft30.4 m3

Go to the Buick Regal Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Buick Regal Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2017

1999 vs. 1996

2013 vs. 1998

2011 vs. 2015

2001 vs. 2012