facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan SE Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan SE Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution IX Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Edition Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evo RS Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2011

2017 vs. 2008

2004 vs. 2009

2016 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2012