facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Ford Ranger vs 1996 Ford Ranger

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2003 Ford Ranger

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 2.3L XL Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 3.0L XL Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 7 Ft Box 3.0L XL Cargo Volume43.4 ft31.23 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 2.3L XLT Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 3.0L XLT Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 7 Ft Box 3.0L XLT Cargo Volume43.4 ft31.23 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 3.0L Edge Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box 3.0L Edge Plus Cargo Volume37.3 ft31.06 m3

1996 Ford Ranger

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
Reg Cab 107.9 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Reg Cab 113.9 Cargo Volume43.5 ft31.23 m3
Reg Cab 107.9 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Reg Cab 113.9 Cargo Volume43.5 ft31.23 m3
Reg Cab 113.9 Cargo Volume43.5 ft31.23 m3
Reg Cab 107.9 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Reg Cab 107.9 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.2 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.4 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.2 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.4 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.4 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
Supercab 125.4 Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3

Go to the Ford Ranger Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Ranger Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2019

2002 vs. 1996

1999 vs. 2001

2022 vs. 2010

1997 vs. 2006