facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution GSR Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution SE Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Touring Trunk Volume6.9 ft30.2 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

No Data Available: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Volume

2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
5dr Sportback Man GTS Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
5dr Sportback CVT GTS Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3
5dr Sportback Ralliart Cargo Volume46.6 ft31.32 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2008

2013 vs. 2005

2010 vs. 2011

2015 vs. 2002

2003 vs. 2014