facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan LS Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan Man DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT DE Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT ES-Sport Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan TC-SST Ralliart Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
4dr Sedan Man GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
4dr Sedan CVT GTS Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2010 vs. 2012

2006 vs. 2008

2002 vs. 2004

2017 vs. 2016

2009 vs. 2015