facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS 2.4L Manual Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GS 2.4L Sportronic Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GT 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3
2dr Convertible Spyder GT 3.0L Sportronic Trunk Volume17.0 ft30.48 m3

2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
3dr Coupe GS 2.4L Manual Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
3dr Coupe GS 2.4L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
3dr Coupe GT 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
3dr Coupe GT 3.0L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
3dr Coupe GTS 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
3dr Coupe GTS 3.0L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume16.9 ft30.48 m3
2dr Spyder GS 2.4L Manual Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3
2dr Spyder GS 2.4L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3
2dr Spyder GT 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3
2dr Spyder GT 3.0L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3
2dr Spyder GTS 3.0L Manual Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3
2dr Spyder GTS 3.0L Sportronic Auto Trunk Volume7.2 ft30.2 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

1998 vs. 2007

2005 vs. 2023

2008 vs. 2010

1997 vs. 2000

2011 vs. 2003