facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 1996 Ford Mustang vs 2017 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

1996 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe Cobra Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Convertible Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible Cobra Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3

2017 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
V6 Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
EcoBoost Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
EcoBoost Premium Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
GT Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
GT Premium Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
Shelby GT350R Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
Shelby GT350 Fastback Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
V6 Convertible Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
EcoBoost Premium Convertible Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
GT Premium Convertible Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2006 vs. 2019

2003 vs. 2000

2008 vs. 2005

2004 vs. 2014

1998 vs. 2010