facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 1996 Ford Mustang vs 2009 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

1996 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Coupe Cobra Trunk Volume10.9 ft30.31 m3
2dr Convertible Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3
2dr Convertible Cobra Trunk Volume7.7 ft30.22 m3

2009 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Coupe Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume13.1 ft30.37 m3
2dr Conv Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume9.7 ft30.27 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2002 vs. 2015

2005 vs. 2017

2021 vs. 2020

2016 vs. 2010

2018 vs. 2004